Wednesday 4 June 2014

BC STUDENTS LAUNCH WALKOUT JUNE 4th 2014

 POSTED at BCSWS FACEBOOK PAGE :
"DEAR BCSWS :
"Good On Ya" : The essential element of evident maturity is accepting responsibility for ones actions - which by example, is absent in the Teachers versus BC dispute / including, the possible issue of contempt of court by government. Students - being the

affected party - are entitled to provisions of international law (see AIREY v IRELAND) regarding government funded legal counsel. Perhaps, it might be productive for STUDENTS to acquire competent legal counsel of choice to launch a "Class Action" for an injunction requiring the Lt. Governor of BC to assume TRUSTEESHIP of the BC Government and the BCTF until such time as the court appeals are rendered on the matters of previous judgments. This could be invoked by the ROYAL PREROGATIVE. Again, "Good On Ya!" 
Regards, Chair, TC1975"
From: TURF WARS VORTEX <turfwarsvortex@gmail.com>
to: ghinfo@gov.bc.ca ,
cc: presidentsoffice@bctf.ca,
 contact.us@bcpsea.bc.ca,
 premier@gov.bc.ca,
 ubcic@ubcic.bc.ca
Dear Lt Governor of BC, M. Judith Guichon
re : TEARS
BC STUDENTS WALK OUT IN "CLASS ACTION" or http://tearslogic.blogspot.ca/  : INVOKING ROYAL PREROGATIVE TO SEEK TRUSTEESHIP

When the integrity of elected officials is questioned in judicial decision-making there arises the public right issue regarding continuance of governance at the pleasure of Elizabeth II; namely, the OATH.
There exists an evident breach of duty of care by the prevailing government in BC - as enunciated by J. Griffin in January 2014. Your duty to Elizabeth II; and, likewise the same duty incumbent upon the Officers of Government in BC, appears to require that you exercise the Royal Prerogative at this time by enforcing a Trusteeship upon this said government on behalf of the public interest and to preserve the integrity of the justice system; namely, the J. Griffin judgment, supra, clearly decides that this said government has conspired in a possible criminal manner to threaten the public safety by forcing the BCTF into a strike situation, contrary to its pleasure. These events appear to be "thuggery"; and, not the enforcement of "justice and mercy" as prescribed by the "Oath" - as undertaken by you, the judiciary, the Attorney General and BC Cabinet.
In the event that you decide not to invoke the Royal Prerogative; and, to establish a Trusteeship until "peace and order" are re-established - i.e., a settlement of contract between BCTF and BC; then, this would likely require the Governor General to be petitioned.
Thank you for proceeding forthwith.
Ralph Charles Goodwin, citizen / Shquiqwal Yuxwuletun : Children v. EII
CSQQN
Decolonization
2389 Quamichan Road, Duncan, BC V9L 5L71.250.709.1809